|
The Patriot: Movie Review
From the Journal of American
History
vol. 87, no. 3, on-line version: http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/jah/87.3/mr_2.html
The
Patriot. Dir. by Roland Emmerich. Centropolis Entertainment, Columbia
Pictures, and sony Pictures Entertainment, 2000. 160 mins.
The
Patriot, directed by Roland Emmerich for Centropolis Entertainment,
Columbia Pictures, and SONY Pictures Entertainment, is a stirring account
of a little-known campaign of a war that has been largely ignored by
Hollywood. It tells the story of Benjamin Martin (Mel Gibson), a South
Carolina planter and widower with seven children. His horrific experiences
in the French and Indian War make him unwilling to take up arms against
the British when South Carolina votes for independence in 1776, though his
eldest son, Gabriel (Heath Ledger), joins the Continental army. Martin is
forced to take sides when the war literally comes into his front yard and
British troops harm his family and burn his home. He assumes command of
the local militia and becomes the scourge of the British, cutting their
supply lines and attacking their outposts. Martin and his men pay a heavy
personal price for their patriotism, but they persevere and play a key
role in defeating the British army in South Carolina. After Gen. Charles
Cornwallis surrenders, Martin and his men return to South Carolina to
rebuild in their independent country.
This film is a well-told,
well-acted, and handsomely photographed historical epic, and accolades
must go to Emmerich and Gibson for tackling a subject that is certainly
less than familiar to the average summer movie patron. Adding more
credibility to the historical accuracy of this film was the participation
of historians from the Smithsonian's National Museum of American History
as consultants. The sets and scenery show much attention to historical
detail. Colonial Charleston, the plantations, villages, and taverns—all
convey an atmosphere of period authenticity. The Fort Carolina set is
especially well done; the British built a number of such forts by
constructing earthwork and palisade fortifications around plantation
houses.
However, much of The Patriot is not historically accurate
in the interpretation of broad themes or in specific details of the
campaign in the South and of warfare in the American Revolution. Gibson
acknowledged, "If one were to adhere to historical accuracy all the way,
you'd probably have the most boring two hours on earth, but firstly it's
entertainment and we've taken license with history to make it more
compelling."
Mel Gibson's character is a composite of several
partisan leaders, most notably Francis Marion, Thomas Sumter, and Andrew
Pickens. Like Marion, Martin makes his headquarters on an island in the
middle of a swamp. Both Sumter and Pickens took up arms after their
plantations were burned by the British. Aside from those facts, Benjamin
Martin has little in common with his real-life counterparts.
The
most serious deficiency of The Patriot is its almost complete omission of
the Loyalists. A significant segment of the population of the Carolinas
and Georgia remained loyal, and much of the fighting there was a civil war
between Tories and Whigs. Though Loyalist provincial and militia units
constituted one-half of the British army in the South, the film portrays
only one Loyalist soldier, Captain Wilkins (Adam Baldwin) in Colonel
Tavington's (Jason Isaacs) dragoons. Tavington is based on Banastre
Tarleton, who commanded the British Legion, a Loyalist provincial
regiment. The film gives the impression that Tavington's regiment is
British and that Captain Wilkins is the only Loyalist in its ranks. No
other Loyalist soldiers appear in The Patriot.
The atrocities
committed by Colonel Tavington and his troops are highly exaggerated.
Benjamin Martin first encounters this bloodthirsty officer after he has
opened up his home to treat the wounded of both sides. Tavington has the
British wounded removed, then orders the execution of the wounded
Continentals and the burning of Martin's plantation. When one of Martin's
sons tries to intervene, Tavington fatally shoots him in the back.
Tavington and his men subsequently murder slaves who refuse to cooperate
with them and go on a farm-burning spree in which they kill the wife and
child of one of Martin's men. The culminating atrocity occurs when
Tavington descends on the village of Wakefield, which is home to a number
of Martin's guerrillas, and has the entire population locked inside the
church, which he then sets ablaze.
Though the real-life Banastre
Tarleton was a ruthless and brutal officer, he never committed atrocities
of the sort depicted in The Patriot. The most notorious episode associated
with Tarleton was the Waxhaws Massacre on May 29, 1780. In that engagement
Tarleton and his legion attacked a regiment of Virginia Continentals. The
Virginians fired only one volley before the Tory horsemen broke their
line. They then tried to surrender, but a killing frenzy took hold of the
Loyalists and most of the helpless Continentals were mercilessly cut down.
Three-quarters of the Virginians were killed or so badly wounded that
Tarleton left them on the field. An American officer who saw the wounded
after the battle estimated that the average number of wounds per man was
sixteen.
Tarleton enthusiastically burned the farms of suspected
Patriots and summarily executed suspected guerrillas—on several occasions
in front of their families. Dastardly as Tarleton's actual behavior was,
it pales in comparison to that of The Patriot's Colonel Tavington. There
is no evidence that Tarleton executed wounded Continentals, nor that he
killed women and children. The British had a very practical motivation for
not killing their Continental captives, as it would invite retaliation
against British prisoners. The Waxhaws Massacre occurred in the heat of
battle and was exacerbated by the intense animosity between Tories and
Whigs. In an interview, Gibson acknowledged, "Some of the worst crimes
were committed between the Loyalists and the Rebels, the colonists
themselves." However, when Tavington is preparing to incinerate the church
with the villagers inside, Captain Wilkins, a Tory, is the only one of his
men to express any reservations.
The portrayal of African
Americans and slavery in the movie has also been a subject of much
controversy. Benjamin Martin is a prominent planter in South Carolina and
thus would have owned slaves. In order not to stigmatize the film's hero,
Martin does not own slaves but employs free black workers, probably the
only such labor arrangement in colonial South Carolina. Later, Martin
takes his family to a "maroon" community of fugitive slaves on the coast
to hide them from the British. In reality, those slaves were hiding from
the Patriots. Thomas Sumter often used slaves seized from Tory owners to
pay his militiamen.
The military details
of uniforms, equipment, and tactics also reveal inaccuracies too numerous
to list here. All British soldiers did not wear red uniforms, and very few
Continental soldiers had blue coats and white trousers. This latter fact
was more accurately depicted in A&E's The Crossing, in which audiences
see little uniformity in the attire of the Continentals. In the southern
campaign most of the American army was militia, and the Continental
contingent had no tents and had trouble acquiring clothing or provisions
of any kind. The Patriot misses an excellent opportunity to show the true
depth of suffering and deprivation that the Continental regulars endured
for independence. The climactic battle in the film also bears little
resemblance to the actual Battle of Cowpens, upon which it is based.
Finally, the field artillery available to both sides could not fire
exploding shells.
In conclusion, The Patriot is a very
entertaining film that uses the American Revolution in South Carolina as a
backdrop to tell a story about the way the war affected a fictional
family. "This is not historically accurate," said Mel Gibson. "In the
broad strokes, yes—on other levels, it is sheer fantasy. It's a good thing
that historians are going to harangue this and say, 'It's not accurate.'
Good. It'll make somebody pick up a book."
William Ross
St. George Jr. Wilmington, North Carolina
|